A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 02:40 on April 27, 2015, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by force by avoiding disturbance, such as setting up a signboard in front of the above restaurant, setting up a reporter in the workplace, and taking a bath for customers, on the ground that the victim G located in the Busan Y, located in the “H” restaurant operated by the victim G, which is located in the Busan Y, while booming with the boom and the city expenses.

2. The Defendant damaged the property by inserting a standing signboard in front of the restaurant at the time, place, and place described in paragraph (1) and destroying the front glass window of the restaurant and destroying the wooden partitions, such as attaching the wooden partitions.

3. Obstruction of Performance of Official Duties, the Defendant, at the time and place specified in paragraph (1) of this Article, and on the ground that the victim J (36 years of age) who is a police officer of the I police box called out after receiving 112 report prevents the Defendant from doing the above act, he saw the victim’s face, and interfered with the Defendant’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the handling of the reported case by his head, and at the same time, inflicted an injury, such as the injury to the victim’s crymical surgery, the number of days

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. Each police statement to G and J;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damage, each investigation report (including the submission of a written statement of opinion, written estimate), written opinion, and written estimate;

1. Articles 314 (1), 366, 136 (1), and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Imprisonment with prison labor for choice of punishment;

1. From among concurrent crimes, the defendant's reasons for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act may not be strictly punished in light of the fact that although the defendant was drunk at the time of the crime of this case, the nature of the crime was extremely poor in light of the content of the crime of this case, which has already been sentenced to suspended execution and punishment for the same crime.