logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.09.29 2016고단2005
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months and a fine not exceeding three hundred thousand won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 1, 2016, the Defendant: (a) driven a two-wheeled vehicle at a section of approximately 23 km from the four distance in the Southwest-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, to the Round Middle School located in about 314, as the center of the Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-do, 801, without obtaining a driver’s license.

2. The accused who has violated the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation shall not operate a motor vehicle on the road, which is owned by a two-wheeled motor vehicle, and has not bought mandatory insurance;

Nevertheless, on February 1, 2016, the Defendant operated the two-wheeled automobile not covered by mandatory insurance at a section of about 23 km from the distance from the South-gu market in Daegu-gu to 314, the center of the middle-gu, Daegu-gu, 801 to the Round Middle-gu, Daegu-dong 801.

3. A person who is engaged in driving a two-wheeled motor vehicle by Defendant CTS125 in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (fugitives)

On February 1, 2016, the Defendant driven the above two-wheeled automobile in front of the Samsung Bio Building in Daegu, Daegu, Daegu, 2095, and proceeded at a speed of 30 to 40km each hour at a speed of 30 to 40km, depending on the road located in the center of the four-distance flood at the center of the half-month.

Since there is a crosswalk, there was a duty of care to check whether a person engaged in driving service has a road to reduce speed and to see well the right and the right of the road, and to drive safely.

Nevertheless, the defendant did not avoid the victim D (77) who crosses the above crosswalk from the right side to the left side, due to the negligence that he neglected to do so while driving without a license as referred to in the above Paragraph 1, and did not avoid the victim D (77) who crosses the above crosswalk from the right side of the two-wheeled automobile driving by the defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant’s negligence on the part of the above business is weak to the victim.

arrow