A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Punishment of the crime

On June 27, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a crime of fraud in the Sungwon District Court's Sungnam branch, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on July 5, 2013.

From May 201, the Defendant: (a) had had an office of No. 410 of the Seongbuk-gu Seoul Building 410 in Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu; (b) had been operating the (ju) DD in the production and distribution company of hub products; and (c) had an unspecified number of customers through business presentation or promotion of business employees to make investments in the Defendant company, thereby attracting investment funds by inducing investors to receive high profits through the production and distribution of hub products, souping construction and operation, and attracting of hub tourism businesses in the future; and (d) had the intent to acquire them by fraud.

1. From May 201 to July 5, 201, the Defendant’s fraud against the victim E means that, at the office of the headquarters headquarters headquarters headquarters headquarters headquarters headquarters headquarters headquarters headquarters headquarters headquarters headquarters headquarters headquarters headquarters headquarters headquarters headquarters headquarters headquarters headquarters headquarters of the Defendant, the Defendant may earn a profit of 7% per month from the amount of 1,90,000 won per month if he/she invested in the victim’s “(state)”. Accordingly, around May 6, 2011, the Defendant was issued KRW 21,020,000 in total five times from that time to July 5, 201, as shown in the list of crimes (1).

(D) However, prior to the incorporation of the Company, such as borrowing funds from G in order to purchase superficies on the site for the production of hybrids located in Seongbuk-gu F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. (i.e., the financial situation of the Company was worse due to the management of the Company through unreasonable methods such as not only the investors’ investment but also the expansion of the agency. In addition, in particular, in order to pay the profits of the high rate of contribution promised to investors, the payment of the profits would have been suspended if the investor did not enter the company in an indefinite manner.