1. The Defendant’s KRW 50,000,000 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of 5% from February 14, 2014 to May 7, 2015.

1. Basic facts

A. C around May 2010, for the purpose of distributing and selling agricultural and fishery products, C Company D (hereinafter “D”).

2) A business start-up consulting company was established and recruited investors through introduction. (2) A solicited investors to make an investment to the effect that “D makes an investment in D and entrusts D with the operation of the store on a department store or large retailer, thereby paying monthly fixed income.”

However, since the establishment, D did not have a stable financial basis in addition to capital KRW 50 million, and there was no few sales stores in department stores, and there was no sales to pay profits to business start-up consulting firms. Since it paid a high amount of fees to investors and paid excessive final profits to investors, D had a business structure that could not pay final profits to investors who invested first with investments received from investors later.

Moreover, since March 201, the consumption in the brupt from Japan's nuclear accident, etc. led to the rapid increase in the amount of consumption, and the financial situation has deteriorated to the extent that it is impossible to cope with the final revenue for investors and the wages of employees.

B. On March 3, 2011, the Plaintiff’s investment background 1) D is the Gangnam-gu Seoul Northern District EF (hereinafter “F”) under the jurisdiction of the head of the Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government North Korean Office.

(2) On March 2011, 201, the Plaintiff reported the business operation of “i.e., the manufacturing and processing business” on the second underground floor. (2) On the second underground floor, the Plaintiff sought advice on the start-up of the business from H, who operates the business consulting company with the trade name “G”.

Around that time, the Defendant, who operated the business start-up consulting company of the trade name “I”, was working to introduce investors to D. However, H’s employees, upon receiving information about D from the Defendant’s employees K in April 201, and then received information about D from D from the Defendant’s employees K. On April 20, 2011, the Plaintiff operated the store from D in F.