Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who drives a bareboat cargo vehicle.

1. On April 12, 2014, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (hereinafter “Special Cases”), driving the said vehicle at a speed of 15:10, and driving the said vehicle on April 12, 201 and driving the said one lane in front of the D cafeteria in Yongcheon-si C at an indefinite speed.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by safely driving, such as taking the front, rear and left well and accurately operating the steering gear and brakes.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and stopped at the edge of the road in the moving direction, and proceeded to the right right side of the vehicle by the victim E (I, 37 years old) driving from the right side of the vehicle of the Defendant, which was driven by the victim E (I, she) who was driving on the right side of the vehicle of the Defendant.

As a result, the Defendant suffered, by negligence in the above business, the injury to the victim E such as salt, tensions, etc., and the injury to the victim G (V, 33 years old) who boarded the damaged vehicle, such as salt and tensions that require two-day medical treatment, and the injury to the victim H (V, 61 years old) who boarded the damaged vehicle, for about three weeks of medical treatment.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act at a temporary location as referred to in the above paragraph 1, thereby damaging property equivalent to KRW 1,935,860 at the repairing cost, such as the Vietnamay panel set of the said victim H or the Trady panel set of the car due to the said accident.

3. The Defendant in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act is the owner of the B Dammy car.

No automobile which is not covered by the mandatory insurance shall be operated on a road.

Nevertheless, the Defendant operated an automobile without mandatory insurance at the time and place under the above paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. E.