logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2013.08.22 2013고단2140
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 03:33 on January 27, 2013, the Defendant: (a) driven a B multilateral-type car under the influence of alcohol content of 0.094% in front of the dry field restaurant located in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, 9-dong; (b) while under the influence of alcohol content of 0.094%.

2. The Defendant in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act is a holder of B Damas joints.

On January 27, 2013, at around 03:33, the Defendant driven a dry field restaurant in front of the dry field restaurant located in Nam-gu, Daegu-gu, 9-dong, and B Dama-si, which was not mandatory insurance.

3. Violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and the violation of the Road Traffic Act are those who are engaged in driving of B teas.

On January 27, 2013, at around 03:33, the Defendant changed the course rapidly to proceed from the front side of the dry field restaurant located in Nam-gu, Daegu, Daegu, about 9-dong, in order to proceed from the front side of the 9-dong Office to the mountainest distance.

At the time, since it is night and the passage of vehicles is frequent, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to prevent the accident in advance by accurately manipulating the steering and steering system.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and thereby driven while under the influence of alcohol content 0.094% by negligence, and received the Done Star Sheet Driving of the Victim C (27 years old) driving running from the direction of the Ansan-distance to the front-distance distance, and received the part of the Defendant’s driving as the front-way driver.

Ultimately, the Defendant’s occupational negligence caused the injury to the victim C, such as catum base, which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment, the injury to the victim E (the 21-year-old passenger), which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment to the victim E (the 21-year-old passenger), the injury to the catum base requiring approximately two weeks of medical treatment to the victim F (the 21-year-old passenger), the injury to the catum base requiring approximately two weeks of medical treatment to the victim G (the 19-year-old passenger), and the injury to the h (the 19-year-old passenger) requiring approximately two weeks of medical treatment.

arrow