logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2014.10.15 2014고단2224
유사수신행위의규제에관한법률위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

A person agreed to pay the full amount of or excess of the investment money in the future without the authorization, permission, etc. of the authority, and did not engage in the act of receiving money, etc. from an unspecified number of investors under the pretext of investment money, etc., the Defendant, without obtaining authorization, permission, etc. from the authority with respect to the act of receiving money, etc., however, established the lower center of an online foreign exchange investment company located in the UK of Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D826 E after soliciting investment from C, and entered the victim F in the above center office on December 17, 2012, at the above center office on December 17, 2012, the victim F: “When the company of E located in the territory of the territory of the Republic of Korea makes an investment of at least 40,000 won, the principal amount shall be 3-5% per day, and the dividend shall be repeated by the same method as 41 days, and the lower investors may receive KRW 100,000,000 won from the victim’s total amount of 1400,20000 20.4.20

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A complaint;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning police statements made to F and G;

1. Article 6 (1) and Article 3 of the Act on the Regulation of Illegal Receipt of Criminal Crimes and Articles 6 (1) and 3 of the same Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Without knowledge of the sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act, the Defendant, without having knowledge of the company E, opened a center to believe that he or she only speaks, thereby causing considerable damage to a large number of investors, and the damage was not completely recovered.

On the other hand, the defendant has no criminal records of the same kind or imprisonment without prison labor.

arrow