logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원통영지원 2016.12.22 2015가단25050
토지인도
Text

1. The Defendants are each indicated in the separate sheet No. 1, 2, 3, 4, 27, 26, 25, and 1 among the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Plaintiff A completed the registration of ownership transfer by means of Law No. 16261, Oct. 25, 1983, with respect to the land in question, E, forest E, 1735 square meters (hereinafter referred to as “instant land before partitioning,” and “FFFFFFF” is omitted in indicating the location of the land, barring any special circumstance. In addition, Plaintiff A completed the registration of ownership transfer pursuant to Law No. 3562, Oct. 25, 1983.

B. On June 15, 1994, H upon the request of Defendant C applied for a survey for the partition of the land before the instant partition to the Korea Cadastral Survey Corporation, and on June 24, 1994, the head of Gun prepared the survey result map according to the above survey result.

C. On June 30, 1994, Defendant C applied for land alteration to divide the instant land before the instant partition to the head of macro-Gun. On the same day, Defendant C was issued a letter of guarantee from the guarantor H, I, and J (or K) that “A purchased L on June 10, 1985 from the Plaintiff A” (hereinafter “instant letter of guarantee”).

On June 30, 1994, the land prior to the instant partition was divided into E 16189 square meters (hereinafter “E”) and L 1166 square meters (hereinafter “L”).

E. Defendant C completed the ownership transfer registration of L by Law No. 4502, Oct. 13, 1994 (hereinafter “instant ownership transfer registration”).

F. The Plaintiff B completed the registration of transfer of ownership as the registration office No. 8021 on March 2, 2006 with respect to E.

G. Defendant D completed the registration of ownership transfer on August 6, 2010 with respect to the portion of 1/2 shares in L, under the receipt No. 34914 on August 6, 2010.

H. As of the closing date of the argument in this case, the Defendants are as follows: “the part not exceeding 98С in the ship (b) which connects each point of the attached drawings Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 27, 26, 25, and 1 of the E among the documents No. 1, 2, 4, 27,

[Reasons for Recognition] Any entry (including each number), in the evidence A(1) to 4, that there is no dispute between the parties.

arrow