A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

Around April 28, 2016, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim by openly insulting the victim with a large voice, such as “domine fe and fraudulent change,” while the victim D, the chairperson of the apartment housing autonomous council, along with 13 representatives of occupants, are dissatisfied with the fact that the victim D, the chairperson of the apartment housing autonomous council, and the representative of the above occupants, etc. are heard.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness D and E;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect with respect to F;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to D;

1. Investigation report (verification of the counter-party telephone of the participants of the meeting);

1. Application of CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes to which video images of the representative conference are stored;

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense and Article 311 of the choice of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which is the order of provisional payment

1. The Defendant, at around 11:00 on May 10, 2016, committed an assault by the victim D (56) on the ground that the victim D (56) told the Defendant that he/she had a management office dispute with E, which is a management office manager, on the ground that he/she was said that he/she had “defluenced ............................”

2. The Defendant consistently denies the facts charged that there is no fact from the investigative agency to the court that there is no fact of harming the victim.

Therefore, each police and legal statement of the victim, E's police statement, and G police statement are used as evidence as to whether the defendant used a name tag and used a name tag and led the victim.

However, the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence adopted and examined by this court, namely, ① the victim, in the initial police investigation, attempted to leave the defendant’s name tag by gathering the defendant’s name tag and attempted to flee.

The statements have been made by the victim.