1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

Purport of claim and appeal

1.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. As between April 7, 2008 and April 30, 2014, during which a trucking transport business was operated under the trade name of “Co. B”, A created a total of 56 vehicle number (right to permission for a transport business) with the permission to increase the number of vehicles by means of preparing a false sales contract as if the number of vehicles for container transport and for cement transport need for business, and filing an application to increase the number of vehicles, and then registered a total of 56 vehicles number (right to permission for a transport business) with the permission to change the relevant documents, such as the notification of the repair of the scrapping for the part, and transferred and distributed the same for consideration. A was found to have been guilty on October 27, 2014 (the Jeonju District Court 2014Da9393) and the prosecutor's judgment on April 27, 2015 (the High Court Decision 2015No274, Apr. 27, 2015).

B. 1) The Plaintiffs are both the former Trucking Transport Business Act (amended by Act No. 14725, Mar. 21, 2017; hereinafter “former Trucking Transport Business Act”).

(2) The Defendant filed a report on the transfer of the trucking transport business with respect to the instant vehicles that were acquired as above, and the Defendant accepted all of them. The Plaintiffs received the instant trucking transport business from August 2009 to January 2015, 200.

C. The Defendant, on July 20, 2016, issued the instant disposition, on the ground that the instant vehicles were illegally increased, Article 19(1) of the former Trucking Transport Act.