Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The summary of the facts charged is a person who is deaf and live in a residential area.
On January 15, 2015, the Defendant, at the community center located in the Cheongdo-gun, Cheongdo-gun, Cheongbuk-do-si, around 10:00, had not received the amount of money from Nonparty E and F with respect to the construction work from the victim D, the electric source housing construction business operator, but had three members, such as village residents G, H, I, etc., and damaged the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts, such as “D received KRW 1.8 million from the business operator who performed the construction work of electric source housing in the village.”
2. Article 307(2) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts charged of judgment: A judgment dismissing a prosecution for withdrawal of wishing to punish a victim on May 11, 2016, which was after the prosecution of Article 312(2) of the Criminal Act (Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act)