The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the grounds for appeal (one year of imprisonment, confiscation) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the defendant recognized each of the crimes of this case and against his mistake, and even though it is recognized that some accomplices made a statement at an investigative agency that they would be subject to criminal punishment, it is highly harmful to society by encouraging excessive speculative spirit, and there is a need to strictly punish illegal game room business such as the crime of this case as the crime of this case, and there is no need to eradicate despite continuous control, since the defendant lent the name of multiple game centers to allow them to continue to operate illegal game resorts while under investigation, in light of the size, operation period, operation method, etc. of each of the game of this case, the liability of the crime is not easy, and the fact that each of the crimes of this case and the crime of violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act which became final and conclusive are concurrent crimes under the latter part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act is considered to be sufficiently considered at the court below. In full view of various sentencing conditions stipulated in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence, etc., the above assertion by the defendant is unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.