1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit, including the part resulting from the supplementary participation, are all assessed against the Plaintiff.

(a) Injury to a material that interferes with the investigation of the Commission due to excessive conduct, verbal abuse, intimidation, etc. against the activities of the First Truth Investigation Committee: injury by assaulting a school's house fixtures, such as cutting off a wall: Intimidation by assaulting the staff T to make sure that the information he/she has become aware of in the course of performing the duties of the Strategic Budget Team would be disclosed to the public, prejudice to dignity, and prejudice to the duty of the staff: A series of acts set forth above would impair the dignity of the staff and his/her job discipline;

2. A violation of the provisions in appointing an ice professor for industry-academic cooperation who incurred a financial loss by providing the cause of a dispute by neglecting business affairs related to the F and lease agreements, etc., and paying the rent within the deadline, because of the payment of additional charges.

3. As above, in violation of the provisions of Article 5 (Duty of Fidelity), Article 17 (Completion of Liability), and Article 18 (Establishment of Work Years) of the Rules of Employment, thereby falling under Article 94 (Reasons for Disciplinary Action) 1, 2, and 3 of the Rules of Employment* For the foregoing reason, the part relating to the appointment of the Intervenor to be placed in the dismissal of the Intervenor is called "Disciplinary Reason 3."

(4) On April 4, 2017, the Intervenor appealed to the instant dismissal disposition and filed a petition for reexamination with the Plaintiff. On April 17, 2017 and June 30, 2017, the Plaintiff held a general staff reexamination committee.

On June 30, 2017, the Review Committee excluded the Intervenor from the grounds for disciplinary action No. 2-1 regarding the conclusion of a lease agreement on the grounds of doubt as to whether the Intervenor was negligent in performing his/her duties. However, the remainder of the grounds for disciplinary action, such as the grounds for disciplinary action No. 1, 2-1, and 3, are recognized. The rest of the grounds for disciplinary action, such as the grounds for disciplinary action No. 1, 2-1, and 3, the Intervenor dismissed the Intervenor’s request for review and decided to dismiss the Intervenor’s

5) With respect to the actions described in Paragraph B-3(b) above, the intervenor.