1. The plaintiffs' respective claims against the defendant Seoul Housing and Urban Corporation and Seoul Special Metropolitan City are dismissed.

2. Defendant.

Basic Facts

On October 6, 2003, the Seoul Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government notice of the 604,136m square meters was designated as an urban development zone (title: SeoulF Housing Site Development District; hereinafter “instant development zone”) under the Urban Development Act, and its development plan was approved. The defendant Seoul Housing and Urban Corporation (the name was at the time of the Seoul Metropolitan Government Urban Development Corporation; the name was at the time of March 17, 2004; the change was made as at September 1, 2016; hereinafter “the defendant Corporation”) was designated as the implementer of the said urban development project.

On October 23, 1997, the date of the public announcement of the authorization to implement the project for the project for the rearrangement of G apartment rearrangement projects of the Plaintiff’s project implementer 1 A Seoul Special Metropolitan City (Delegation to the Gu) G apartment rearrangement projects of the Seoul Special Metropolitan City (Delegation to the Gu) on October 23, 1997, on July 30, 2002, Jung-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City H Village, Jung-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City on July 30, 1997. Meanwhile, as the Plaintiffs were incorporated into the project district of each public project (hereinafter “each public project of this case”), the Plaintiffs provided their own houses, land, etc. for each public project of this case as indicated in the following table.

Accordingly, according to the incorporation into each of the above businesses, the Defendants decided to specially supply apartment buildings to be constructed in the development zone of this case (hereinafter “instant apartment buildings”) as part of the relocation measures against the Plaintiffs who lost their means of livelihood due to expropriation of their own housing or land, etc.

The sale price for the above special supply was determined as the same amount as the sale price for the apartment sold to the general public.

On February 2, 2010, the Plaintiff 104 A 604 423,541,000 744.411, 201, Feb. 2, 2010, 2010: C 103 106 503 415,438,000 74.42, 2010 33, 2010 103 106 415,438,00 74.411, 201, the Defendant Corporation had the instant development zone from November 2004 to May 2, 201.