1. Defendant Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government shall have the Plaintiff B KRW 24,161,375, and Defendant Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government shall have the Plaintiff G.

1. Basic facts

A. The remaining plaintiffs except the plaintiffs C, E, and F were incorporated into the project district of each public works specified in the "Name of Public Works" column (hereinafter referred to as "each of the public works in this case") executed by each defendant, stating the housing, land, etc. under their ownership as listed below, and provided their own housing, land, etc. for each of the public works in this case.

On March 21, 1998, the date of public announcement of the authorization for the implementation of the project for the name of the Plaintiff’s public project, 1 A, the Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Construction Project for the public parking lot in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Seoul Metropolitan Government on August 3, 2002, the construction project for the public parking lot in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on August 3, 16, 2002, and on April 4, 2008, the Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Residential Environment Improvement Project on November 5, 2002, the Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government N-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on November 5, 2002, and the Redcheon Maintenance Project between O on June 15, 199.

Accordingly, the Defendants, as incorporated into each of the instant public works, decided to specially supply apartment units (hereinafter “instant apartment units”) to be constructed in the Seoul District for the New Housing Site Development (hereinafter “R District”) in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government as part of the relocation measures against the above Plaintiffs who lost their means of living due to expropriation of their own housing units or lands, etc. as part of the relocation measures.

C. The Defendant Housing and Urban Corporation (the name at that time was E.S., and the name was changed from November 2004 to May 1, 201) constructed the instant apartment in the R district from around November 2004 to conclude each sales contract for the special supply of the instant apartment from around 2008 to May 201 to the said Plaintiffs (hereinafter “each sales contract in this case”), and the said Plaintiffs completely paid the sales price to the Defendant Housing and Urban Corporation.

The remaining payment date of the Plaintiff 1 A 303 503,527,000 on the remainder payment date of the co-owned land share area of 1 A 303 503,527,000.