logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2014.05.30 2013고단1584
사기
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

The Defendant, around October 27, 2009, entered into a sales contract with D, the actual operator of D and (State), and with respect to the land (hereinafter “instant land”) other than 7 lots (hereinafter “instant land”) owned by Chungcheongnam-gun E, Chungcheongnam-gun, the purchase price of which is KRW 1.3 billion. However, on the ground that the contract deposit was not paid on the agreed date, the Defendant was notified by C of the rescission of the contract around December 11 of the same year.

After that, D asked the purport that the purchaser can be identified in order to sell the instant land at a higher price than the above purchase price, and the Defendant, upon D’s request, did not color the purchaser as requested by D, but did not want to enter into a sales contract with D as if it was delegated with D’s authority to enter into the sales contract, and attempted to have some of the purchase price.

On June 2, 2010, the Defendant: (a) came to know of the information from the introduction of “G” office in the “G” office located in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun; (b) sold at a price higher than the market price to H who is the owner of the instant land; (c) paid a down payment of KRW 190 million and an intermediate payment of KRW 1730,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,0000,000 won; (d) the Defendant paid

However, as above, the Defendant merely received the above physical color from D and concluded a contract with the purchaser or the purchase price, and did not have been delegated the authority to receive it. Moreover, the Defendant did not obtain prior consent from D when concluding the contract with the victim, and the Defendant did not deliver it to D when receiving the down payment and the intermediate payment from the victim.

arrow