The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

The judgment below

Examining the evidence duly admitted by the first instance court, which maintained the reasoning of the lower court, the lower court was justifiable to have determined that the Defendant was guilty of the violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. due to the Metecamination on July 24, 2014 among the facts charged in the instant case on the grounds stated in its reasoning. In so doing, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, there were no errors by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal principles on the vol

In addition, the argument that the judgment of the court below did not recognize mental disorder is not a legitimate ground for appeal, which is alleged in the ground for appeal by the defendant as the ground for appeal or by the court below as the subject of judgment ex officio.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.