beta
Text
Defendant
All appeals filed by A and prosecutor are dismissed.
Reasons
1. Summary of grounds for appeal;
A. As to Defendant A1’s assault, Defendant A did not commit an assault by smugglinging the victim L, or by bating bats and arms.
2) The sentence sentenced by the court below to the above defendant (two years of suspended sentence in October) is too unreasonable.
B. In full view of the fact 1) misunderstanding (the part of the judgment of the court below) of the victim L is consistent, there is a medical certificate of injury corresponding thereto, and Defendant C was an employee of the company operated by Defendant A, who attempted to damage the building managed by the above victim A at the time of the instant case, it is recognized that Defendant A and C conspired with each other to inflict an injury on the above victim.
2) The sentence sentenced by the lower court to Defendant B and A (2 years of suspended sentence of imprisonment with prison labor for six months, and two years of suspended sentence of imprisonment with prison labor for ten months) is too uneased and unreasonable.
2. Determination
A. The following circumstances acknowledged by the lower court based on the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the lower court on the part of Defendant A’s assertion of fact: (a) the victim stated in the investigative agency and the lower court that “Defendant A did with his fat and arms,” and the witness S made a statement corresponding to the victim’s statement in the investigative agency and the lower court’s court’s trial, which read: (b) the victim’s statement in the investigative agency and the lower court that “a person with a large height (Defendant A) was sealed by hand, sealed on the wall, and fighted on the wall,” and (c) the witness made a statement consistent with the victim’s statement (S was somewhat inconsistent with the investigation agency and the lower court with regard to whether the Defendant showed the above victim’s appearance, but the credibility of the above statement is recognized by consistently making a statement on the remaining parts).
Therefore, Defendant A’s assertion is without merit.
(b).