Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of the lawsuit, including the part resulting from the supplementary participation, are all assessed against the Plaintiff.
Reasons
The reasons for the decision
A. 1) The Plaintiff is a school foundation that establishes and operates C secondary schools, D high schools, Chigh schools, E University, etc. under their control. 2) The Intervenor was appointed as a non-retirement professor for two years from September 1, 2009 to August 31, 201, and applied for the new teachers appointment procedure upon receipt of notification from the Plaintiff on April 29, 201, but was dismissed during the final appointment procedure.
The intervenor filed a lawsuit against the plaintiff to confirm his/her teacher status as Seoul Central District Court 201Ga24533, and was sentenced on April 18, 201 to confirm that the disposition to refuse the reappointment as of April 29, 201 of the plaintiff on April 18, 2011 is null and void, and the plaintiff appealed, but the plaintiff dismissed the appeal on June 9, 2014, and the intervenor was sentenced to the same year.
9.1. He was reinstated as a full-time professor at E University.
B. On July 15, 2014, the Plaintiff’s deliberation by the Teachers’ Personnel Committee, on August 8, 2014, passed a resolution by the president of the E University on August 8, 2014, and on August 12, 2014, requested the Teachers’ Disciplinary Committee to make a resolution on the disciplinary action against the Intervenor on October 14, 2014.
(2) The Intervenor used 26,09,50 won as labor cost, direct cost, indirect cost, etc. from May 1, 2011 to April 30, 2012 to February 2012 and used 26,259,50 won as labor cost, indirect cost, etc. from the end of February 2012 to the end of February 1, 2012 and used 26,09,550 won as 150 won as 18,194,950 won for March 18, 2012 and 6,894,50 won for April 6, 209, and 51,339,450 won for a total of KRW 51,39,450 for a research project from the Korean Research Foundation.
Although a corporate research fee card is to be used within the limit of the research contract amount, the intervenor is a private person, and the intervenor is 300,000,000,000,000 G cafeteria, 14:51 H on March 30, 2012, and 300,000,000,000 on March 30, 2012, and 14:56 I 30,000,000,000,000.