logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2018.09.06 2018고합36
강제추행상해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for five years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2018 Gohap 36"

1. In around October 25, 2017, the Defendant forced indecent act Defendant 23:35, 2017, at the singing room No. 1 room operated by the victim D (M, 51 years of age) located in C (M, 51 years of age). Under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant expressed his/her employee and the victim with the desire to “hyp dyp dyp dyp dyp dyp dyp hyp hys.”

Therefore, the victim shows his employee to the outside of the room, and the defendant "I am unable to be a guest," and the defendant is shot, and the defendant "I am unable to do so".

”라고 욕설을 하며 갑자기 한 손으로 피해자의 음부를 강하게 움켜잡아 수회 흔들고, 피해자가 피고인의 뺨을 때리며 저항하자 “ 미친년” 이라고 욕설을 하며 피해자의 몸을 밀쳐 그곳 소파 사이로 넘어뜨린 후 한 손으로 피해자의 머리채를 움켜잡아 흔들고 다른 손에 쥔 핸드폰으로 피해자의 머리를 수회 때리고 짓눌러 피해자에게 약 2 주간의 치료가 필요한 ‘ 열린 두개 내 상처가 없는 진탕 등’ 의 상해를 가하였다.

2. The injured Defendant is the victim E (50 h) who has avoided disturbance, such as assaulting D at the time and place specified in paragraph 1 as above, and has heard such noise in other rooms.

“Along with the fact that the Defendant she was walking the back part of the victim’s body due to marith’s marithy, the victim’s chest and face were taken once every time and the victim’s chest and face were boomed by a marith’s marithy, etc., and the victim was boomed with a plebrogate that requires treatment for about

On October 22, 2017, the Defendant parked H cargo vehicle in front of the “G” located in the Hacheon-si, 12:00 on October 22, 2017. On the ground that the Defendant obstructed the progress of J cargo vehicle of the victim I (5 years old) by the victim I (5 years old), and damaged the victim’s truck driver’s seat of the victim’s vehicle due to an influence in the city with the victim, and then damaged the victim’s door to the extent that the repair cost is influence on one occasion, the Defendant 201 was flue. kne.

arrow