1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On May 6, 2004, the Plaintiff was determined as Grade III as a result of a draft physical examination by Defendant Daejeon Daejeon District Military Manpower Office, and was assigned to military service for those subject to enlistment in active duty service.

On July 7, 2017, the Plaintiff applied for a change in the disposition of military service while the date of enlistment was postponed for various reasons, and on the ground that the result of the draft physical examination falls under “unauthorized congenital type” as a result of the draft physical examination, the Plaintiff was determined as class 4 and was subject to a change in the disposition of military service for

B. On August 28, 2017, the Plaintiff filed an application for change of a military service disposition with the Defendant on the ground of “fluence,” and on March 15, 2018, the Plaintiff filed an objection against the said determination on March 26, 2018 on the ground that the result of a draft physical examination falls under Article 11(1) [Attachment Table 2] [Attachment Table 2] of the former Rules on Inspection, such as Physical Examination for Military Service (amended by Ordinance of the Ministry of National Defense No. 950, Feb. 1, 2018; hereinafter “instant Rules”).

C. On May 15, 2018, the central physical center conducted a precise physical examination for the Plaintiff, and again rendered a physical grade 4 determination against the Plaintiff. Accordingly, Defendant Daejeon District Military Manpower Office rendered a disposition of military service subject to call-up to social work personnel service (hereinafter “instant disposition”) to the Plaintiff on May 23, 2018.

On June 18, 2018, the director of the regional military manpower office of the Chungcheongbuk-do notified the Plaintiff that he would respond to the convening of the two universities (hereinafter “instant convening disposition”).

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1, 7, 9, Eul evidence 1, Eul evidence 1, Eul evidence 1, Eul's whole purport of pleading

2. Whether each of the dispositions of this case is legitimate

A. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion is to restrict the general activities due to continuous pains caused by mergers, including air ventilation, such as chratitis, etc., on both sides of the following astronomical lusium, the right-side lusium salt, and on both sides, the first middle lusium, and the ability to exercise was lowered.

The contents, symptoms, etc. of these diseases.