logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2016.11.17 2016고단2859
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving freight B 25 tons or more.

On March 31, 2015, at around 23:40, the Defendant, at the lower end, proceeded six lanes at the lower end of the Seoul East Metropolitan Area Highway (PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP) along the four-lanes of the two-lanes, along the two-lanes of the two-lane

When intending to change course of a motor vehicle and there is a concern over hampering normal traffic of other motor vehicles running in the direction to which the driver of any motor vehicle intends to change course, he/she shall not change course, and has the duty of care to prevent accidents, such as accurately manipulating the devices of all the motor vehicles, such as steering gear, brake system, etc., while keeping his/her steering gear and right and right and right well.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and went on five-lanes in the same direction that the Defendant driven by the victim C (V, 47 years old) who was driving by the Defendant, followed by the left side of the D Spati vehicle in the same direction that the Defendant driven, followed by a part front of the above cargo vehicle on which the Defendant drives, and turned the said Spati vehicle into the center, lost its right side, and moved to the right side.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim due to the above occupational negligence for about six months, such as the c4/C5 trend requiring treatment, and suffered injury to the victim due to the injury of the 4/C5 trend, and the Defendant suffered injury corresponding to class 4 of aggregate disability due to the 5th grade of the function which was not performed after the treatment and the 6th grade of the permanent function

2. Judgment dismissing a public prosecution pursuant to Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act, which states a written agreement on October 27, 2016, after the institution of public prosecution for the crime of non-compliance with judgment (main sentence of Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents);

arrow