logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2016.05.19 2015고정773
명예훼손
Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

around 16:00 on December 5, 201, the Defendant and his children attended the same elementary school and sent their parents with each other with each other. On the first floor of the commercial building where a dental patient working for the victim in E in light of the name of light, the Defendant damaged the victim’s reputation by publicly pointing out the following facts: “A dental nurse opens the money with her husband in her husband and the wind, and she is not a mother with her mother in her mother.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes in which statements made by the police in F are recorded;

1. Relevant Article 307 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of punishment, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which is the order of provisional payment

1. 이 부분 공소사실의 요지 피고인은 판시 기재 일시 장소에서 판시와 같은 말을 하고 계속하여 위 상가의 2 층에 있는 치과에 들어와 병원 직원인 H, 원장 I 등 다른 사람들이 보는 앞에서 피해자에게 “ 바람 핀 증거가 있으며 바람난 부도덕한 기지배가 어디서 멀쩡하게 얼굴 들고 다니냐,

A man having a home shall be panty spanty spanty and spande;

It is why the family bankruptcy is caused or not.

“The honor of the victim was damaged by openly pointing out false facts.”

2. Determination

A. The Defendant asserts to the effect that he did not have made the above remarks as to the facts charged in this part of the facts charged.

The evidence consistent with this part of the facts charged includes witness D and H’s legal statement, but when considering the following circumstances, it is difficult to believe the above statement.

Defendant submitted to this Court a recording file and a recording record as evidence of impeachment of the above evidence.

Such recording files or records have been altered;

There is no circumstance to view, and the content of this case is examined.

arrow