logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2015. 09. 15. 선고 2015두43889 판결
양도소득세등부과처분취소[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court-2014-Du61875 (Law No. 15, 2015)

Title

Disposition Disposition Imposing Capital Gains Tax

Summary

Since the Defendant rendered a decision to revoke ex officio the disposition of imposition as to the part against the Defendant among the judgment of the lower court in accordance with the purport of the lower judgment after final appeal, the Defendant’s decision to revoke the above-mentioned part of the lawsuit in this case is seeking revocation of the disposition

Cases

2015Du4389 Revocation of Disposition of Imposing capital gains tax, etc.

Plaintiff

*

Defendant

The director of the Namincheon Tax Office

Imposition of Judgment

5, 2015

Text

The part of the judgment of the court below against the defendant is reversed, and the judgment of the court of first instance as to this part is revoked, and this part of the lawsuit

The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

9/10 of the total costs of litigation shall be borne by the Plaintiff, and the remainder by the Defendant, respectively.

Reasons

The grounds of appeal are examined.

1. Judgment on the Defendant’s grounds of appeal

According to the records, the defendant's judgment of the court below on June 4, 2015, which is subsequent to the appeal, according to the purport of the court below.

The fact that a decision of correction on reduction is made with respect to the part against the defendant ex officio revocation.

B. Since the above part of the lawsuit in this case was revoked as above, the claim for the cancellation of the disposition that had not been extinguished and became unlawful as there was no interest in the lawsuit.

2. Judgment on the Plaintiff’s grounds of appeal

The petition of appeal filed by the Plaintiff does not contain any indication in the grounds of appeal, and is filed within the statutory period.

In the absence of submission.

3. Conclusion

Therefore, the part of the judgment of the court below against the defendant is reversed, and it is directly re-written by the Supreme Court

Since it is sufficient to read, the judgment of the first instance on this part shall be revoked, and this part shall be revoked.

The plaintiff's appeal shall be dismissed, and 9/10 of the total costs of the lawsuit shall be the plaintiff, and the remainder shall be the defendant.

A. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

arrow