A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Punishment of the crime

"2014 Highest 6388"

1. On June 27, 2014, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, around 22:01, the Busan High-ro, Busan High-ro, Busan High-ro, 111, the 6 Busan High-ro police station, stating that “A, in the vicinity of the 6 Busan High-ro police station, the head of the police station affiliated with the Busan High-ro, told the Defendant to go to the auxiliary police officer and the police officer in the vicinity of the police station,” and that “A, at the same time, go back once, once the above C’s threshold is turned back, and the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties concerning the crime prevention and civil petitions of the above C, by hand when the shoulder and the breast part were 3 times the shoulder and the breast part were broken up

2. At around 22:50 on the same day, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim victim F in the “E District” affiliated with the said E District located in Busan District District D, by stating that “The Defendant is “The Victim F of the said E District, the friende, the friende, the friende, and the friende at the window of 300 friende, the body friende, the friende, and the friende, the friende in which the friende is the friende,” and subsequently,

On September 13, 2014, from around 15:00 to 16:00 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) demanded money from the victim I (n) in the Busan-gu Busan-gu H; (b) from the 'J points' operated by the victim I (n) of the victim I (n', 57 years of age) to customers who drink; and (c) demanded money from the "J points" operated by the Busan-gu H, Busan-gu; and (d) expressed and expressed desire to take money into large interest, thereby obstructing the victim's main business by force.

around 20:25 on December 2, 2015, the Defendant: (a) 20:20:25 on the Defendant’s house located in the Busan Jin-gu, Busan; and (b) 3-4 cigarette fluencing tobacco using a disposable dog.

In such a case, even though the Defendant has a duty of care to verify the existence of a fire after the string of the string of the string, etc., the Defendant did not check whether the string remains after the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string.

After that, the Defendant was diving in the next place.