1. The Defendant’s KRW 38,461,30 as well as 5% per annum from April 3, 2015 to August 24, 2016, and the next day.

1. Basic facts

A. On March 1, 1998, the Plaintiff was appointed as a full-time lecturer in charge of the teaching subjects at the Defendant C University (the current name is D University; hereinafter referred to as “D University”) and was reappointed on March 1, 199 and March 1, 2001, respectively. The Plaintiff was promoted to the assistant professor on April 1, 2001 and the associate professor on April 1, 2005, respectively, and was reappointed on September 1, 201, and serves as an associate professor in charge of the teaching subjects at D University as of the date of closing argument in the instant case, and the Defendant is a school juristic person operating D University.

B. On March 1, 1999, the Defendant: (a) prepared a salary table based on the annual salary order in the order of public order by not later than the end of 1998; and (b) maintained the salary system that pays the amount calculated by adding the said salary and various allowances to the salary as the salary; (c) newly established a provision on the payment of annual salary based on the annual salary system that reflects the performance of each teacher in the immediately preceding year; and (d) implemented the performance-based annual salary system on the basis of the total amount of wages without performance evaluation for the year 199; and (e) assessed the performance of the previous year from the year 2000 to the payment of annual salary.

C. On February 25, 199, the Defendant explained the implementation of the annual salary system at the Teachers’ Training Council held prior to the enactment of the provision on the payment of the annual salary system for the performance-based bonus, and received individual written consent from teachers around March 199.

Since then, when the validity of the provision on the payment of the annual salary system for the performance-based bonus becomes an issue, professor E, who was the planning director of the D University, held a faculty meeting to obtain ratification of the above payment provision on July 15, 2010, and 40 of the participants at the time (the teachers appointed to D University before the enactment of the above provision on the payment of the annual salary system for the performance-based bonus was made and were in office at the time of the said faculty meeting) attended 45, and signed the letter of approval of the “written consent to supplement the annual salary system

(However, the Plaintiff did not sign). E

The defendant shall be given piece rates again at the end of January 2015.