(영문) 울산지방법원 2019.06.21 2019고단432

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 울산지방법원 2019.06.21 2019고단432

공무집행방해

Text

[Defendant A] The defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

However, this judgment has become final and conclusive against Defendant A.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A: (a) around 00:05 on Nov. 12, 2018, the Defendant: (b) obstructed a street-off from the road in Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-do; and (c) resisted Defendant A’s dissatisfactions that he was subject to the influence of drinking alcohol, the police station affiliated with the Ulsan-do Police Station, where he was under the influence of drinking alcohol, to the extent that he was affiliated with the Ulsan-do Police Station, where he was under the influence of drinking alcohol, the Defendant would not interfere with the illegal drinking control; (d) he threatened Defendant A with the police officer of the Ulsan-do Police Station, where he was under the influence of drinking alcohol; (e) he was a police officer in charge of blue-do; (e) he was under the influence of a press organization, and (e) he was under the influence of a press organization, and (e) was under the influence of the Internet, and (e) the police officer who was under the influence of drinking alcohol, who was under the influence of drinking alcohol.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the crackdown on drinking driving.

2. Defendant B, at the same time and place as the above paragraph (1) of the same Article, accused C was dissatisfied with the fact that he was subject to the influence of alcohol driving, was asked to D and C’s position and class to the head of the Ulsan Coast Police Station, and F’s position and class repeatedly. At the patrol vehicle located therein, Defendant B interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the control of alcohol driving by police officers due to a sudden accident for about 1 hour and 20 minutes, such as getting off the container, and not getting off without permission, etc. at the patrol vehicle.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Copy of a protocol of suspect examination of police officer C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to cut down a photograph;

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

(a) Defendant A: Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act;

B. Defendant B: Article 3(2) of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act.

참조조문

-경범죄 처벌법 제3조 제2항

-형법 제136조 제1항

유사 판례

-수원지방법원 평택지원 2020.01.22 2019고단1473

-광주지방법원 2017.07.05 2017고단2105

-울산지방법원 2015.11.23 2015고단2066

-창원지방법원 2014.10.02 2014고합198

-서울중앙지방법원 2016.04.21 2015고정4622