beta
Text
The punishment of the accused shall be determined by two years of imprisonment.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant, a former police officer from January 2013 to December 2015, became aware of the victims while taking charge of financial counseling services in C corporation, and was taking charge of financial counseling services at police stations and police schools.
1. The Defendant, around March 2015, made an investment in cash at the French coffee shop located in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, to the victim D, with the interest of 1% per month by investing it in the monthly private equity fund aimed at the emergency chief public offering, and with the principal refunded at any time.
“After entering into an investment delegation contract with the victim, on March 27, 2015, the victim transferred KRW 20 million to F on the following day after receiving the remittance from the injured party to the Defendant’s Matz comprehensive financial securities account (E).
On July 3, 2015, the Defendant returned KRW 20 million from F and embezzled money for the victim. Around that time, the Defendant embezzled money as money for gambling on the Internet.
2. On April 30, 2015, the Defendant would make an investment to the victim D at a non-permanent location on April 30, 2015, with the interest of 1% per month by investing money in the monthly payment-based private equity fund aimed at the high-class public offering, and with the principal refunded at any time.
“The phrase “ was false.”
However, even though the defendant was able to use money from the injured party for gambling fund, it did not have the intent or ability to pay the principal and interest to the injured party by investing it in the private equity fund.
On April 30, 2015, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 277,00,000 from the nine victims about 13 times from the victim to November 10, 2015, in addition to receiving KRW 20,000 from the Defendant’s Mtsts comprehensive financial securities account (E). From around that time, the Defendant acquired and acquired KRW 277,00,000 from the nine victims about 13 times as shown in the crime sight table.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Statement made by the police with regard to D;
1. G, H, I,
J. K, L, M,.