logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.09.03 2018고합132
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(향정)
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for seven years.

Those remaining after being used for the appraisal of seized 985g (No. 1).

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2018 Gohap 132 - Defendant A

1. Notwithstanding that Defendant A is not a narcotics handler, around February 2018, Defendant A conspired to receive the said postal items in Korea if he/she sent them to the Republic of Korea by packaging a philopon from an Lao to the Republic of Korea, with a name-free box in Vietnam (one name “C” or “D”) (one name “philopon”; hereinafter “philopon”).

Accordingly, Defendant A, on February 1, 2018, had the above person under the name of the deceased, put the plastic paper containing approximately KRW 985 g (or approximately KRW 49,250,000 in the market price) into a audio room, covered the above audio product in a wooden board, concealed the above audio product again into a normal audio product in a stude box and disguised it into a normal audio product, and then made the receiver column “E (Tel.F)” into the receiver column “GGIVIVIVIVITYYH”, and sent the above flight to the above special air class (I) around 06:20 on February 16, 2018.

As a result, Defendant A imported philophones in collusion with the above-mentioned person.

“2018 Gohap 208 - Defendant B

2. Notwithstanding that Defendant B is not a handler of narcotics, around February 2018, Defendant B, along with Defendant A and Vietnam’s name in secret boxes (one name “C” or “D”), intended to import the Meteptoptoty (one name “philopon”; hereinafter “philopon”), a local mental medicine medicine, into the Republic of Korea. Defendant B provided address for contact address of the addressee of the postal item, and conspired to take charge of receiving the said postal item in the Republic of Korea if Defendant B sent the said name to the place of receiving the instant postal item by packaging the Raphone from the Ras to the place of receiving it by Defendant B.

Accordingly, on February 2, 2018, Defendant B, through Defendant A, is an unsatisfic person of the above name.

arrow