logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2013.10.21 2013고단2357
도로법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

The summary of the facts charged in this case is as follows: (a) around 03:05 on August 8, 2001, the employees of the Defendant violated the statutes by loading and operating freight exceeding 2.015 tons, which is more than 2.015 tons from the third axis of large freight vehicles, in front of the moving of the Incheon Highway 7.4km Branch Office in the direction Seoul Highway in the direction of Seoul, and on the street before the vehicle inspection station.

However, with respect to the former Road Act which was prosecuted by a prosecutor by applying the facts charged in this case, the Constitutional Court (1) decided July 30, 2008Hun-Ga17, and Article 86 of the former Road Act (wholly amended by Act No. 7832, Dec. 30, 2005; Act No. 8976, Mar. 21, 2008); when an agent, employee or other worker of a corporation commits an act of violation under Article 83 (1) 2 of the Act, the portion of the Act was sentenced to a fine under Article 83 (2) 2 of the Act; (2) the Act was against the Constitution; (3) the Act was amended by Act No. 4920, Oct. 28, 2010; (4) the Act was amended by Act No. 974, Dec. 28, 2005; and (3) the Act was amended by Act No. 974, Dec. 16, 20199>

Therefore, Article 47 of the former Road Act, which applies to the instant case, is the Constitutional Court Act.

arrow