logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2014.12.10 2014고단3055
도로법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. A, who is an employee of the defendant, loaded freight in excess of a limited axis on the roads front of the branch office of the Korea Highway Corporation 362.7 km on July 29, 2006, around 11:08 with respect to the defendant's business.

2. The Constitutional Court Order (1) 2008Hun-Ga17 decided July 30, 2009, and Article 86 of the former Road Act (wholly amended by Act No. 7832 of Dec. 30, 2005 and wholly amended by Act No. 8976 of Mar. 21, 2008), which applied the facts charged by a public prosecutor to the facts charged in this case, sentenced an agent, employee or other worker of a corporation to a fine under Article 83 (1) 2 of the Act, to a fine under Article 83 (2) 5 of the former Road Act (wholly amended by Act No. 8976 of Oct. 28, 2010) and Article 9 of the former Road Act (wholly amended by Act No. 4920 of Oct. 28, 2010; 209Hun-Ga38 of the same Act) as an agent, employee or other worker of a corporation under Article 94 of the former Road Act to a fine under Article 9 of the same Act.

Therefore, the provisions of the former Road Act applied to this case retroactively lose its effect in accordance with the proviso of Article 47(2) of the Constitutional Court Act.

If so, the facts charged in this case are not a crime.

arrow