beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The defendant is a director in charge of the business affairs related to the repair of motor vehicle insurance in Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, who is the president of the above C, and the victim E is an employee working for the same company as a motor vehicle inspector.
On July 10, 2017, the Defendant: (a) from the chief prosecutor of the above C C on July 17:45, 2017, the Defendant received a request for attendance from the F. Labor Supervisor of the branch office of the Ministry of Labor and submitted an annual application to the office on July 14, 2017; and (b) a G, who is in charge of the Defendant’s mother’s interest accounting division, submitted a written request for attendance to the office, and (c) a G, who is in charge of the Defendant’s mother’s interest accounting division, may not receive a complaint from the husband; (d) the Defendant
On the ground that “the victim was returned”, the victim sent the application to the Defendant’s personal cell phone (H) with his/her photo affixed the application form.
In the immediately preceding place with three persons, such as I, who are the chief prosecutor, the Defendant does not have the victim “pack this part of the prosecutor, who is worth drinking, to whom the bit of bitbit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a crime.
The victim openly insultingd the victim by referring to the large fabro ar.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Statement made by the police for E;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing the accusation and conversation;
1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;
1. The grounds for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, which have no criminal history against the Defendant, the victim demanded the Defendant’s strict punishment, and the circumstances surrounding the instant case, do not seem to be excessive in light of the sentencing conditions set forth in the summary order.