logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2016.02.17 2015고단3653
공문서부정행사등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is an unqualified person.

1. On March 2015, the Defendant acquired one copy of the victim D’s driver’s license within the scope of 913 U.S. Won-gu Office Building C at Bupyeong-gu, Nowon-gu, Seoul at a time.

Defendant 1 did not take necessary procedures such as returning the above acquired property to the victim and embezzled the property as he had on his own mind.

2. On May 11, 2015, the Defendant on unlawful uttering of official documents: (a) presented the D’s driver’s license under the name of D obtained, such as the above “paragraph 1,” and presented it as the Defendant’s driver’s license, within the 1 week vice head of Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, in order to borrow sirens from E in order to borrow string vehicles, Gangseo-do, 76, the Gangseo-gu, Seoul Metropolitan Government Hanpo Airport.

3. Forgery of private documents and the uttering of a falsified investigation document;

A. In order to rent rental vehicles in the name of the victim D at the same time and place as the above “paragraph 2”, the Defendant forged one copy of the contract for the lease of vehicles in the name of D, which is a private document on the rights and obligations, for the purpose of exercising the signature of the “D” on the vehicle rental contract by using the official approval color pen on the paper of the vehicle rental contract.

B. At the same time and place as above, the Defendant submitted a forged vehicle rental contract to E, a sexual scar employee E, who was aware of the forgery at the same time and place as above, as the above “paragraph 2”, and exercised it as if it was duly constituted.

4. The Defendant, around May 11, 2015, sent a phone call to the Seongbuk-gu Co., Ltd. working for the victim E, thereby paying the car siren cost.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay sirens even after the vehicle sirens.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, received a F K5 vehicle from the victim, and instead did not pay KRW 112,00,000, such as vehicle rental fee, etc., the Defendant acquired financial benefits equivalent to the same amount.

5...

arrow