beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment of eight months, Defendant B’s imprisonment of four months, and Defendant C’s fine of three thousand won, respectively.
Defendant .
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
B was non-permanent audit of D, and came out as a candidate for the election of the president of a cooperative, which was implemented on March 13, 2019.
Defendant
A was elected on May 23, 2019 by going through a special election of non-permanent auditors conducted on May 23, 2019 in order to elect non-permanent auditors who were held vacant in the election of the president of the partnership of Defendant B.
Defendant
C was non-permanent directors from February 25, 2012 to February 24, 2019.
"2019 Highest 829"
1. At around 16:00 on May 18, 2019, Defendant A offered money to F in front of the residence of the representative F, who is the elector of the non-permanent audit election, a member of the said union in Jinju-si, a member of the said union, who is the non-permanent director of the said union, for the following reasons: “A who leaves the election once introducing the Defendant; and then leaves the place after introducing the Defendant; and the Defendant asked F to affix one vote for the election.”
As a result, the defendant provided money to the union members for the purpose of election in the H association executive election.
2. Joint criminal conduct by Defendant A and B;
A. On May 19, 2019, the Defendants: (a) around 18:00 on May 19, 2019, at the top of the residence of the J of the representative elected by a member of the said union, who is a non-permanent auditor, who is a member of the said union I; and (b) Defendant B: (c) “I will have to be elected once after one year from the date on which A was elected as an auditor; (d) will again be elected again; and (e) Defendant A requested the J to provide support.”
Defendant A continuously delivered 10,00 won of 50,000 won (50,000 won) to Defendant B on two occasions, and Defendant B provided money to J by inserting 10,000 won to the right part of J.
As a result, the Defendants conspired to act as an officer of H.A.