logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2017.06.15 2017고정253
상해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 5, 2016, the Defendant violated the room: (a) at the main point of “D” located in Yansan-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Yansan-si, and (b) at the time other than the victim E (n, 47 years of age) who is an employee of the said main point; (c) however, even if the injured party was demanded that the victimized party enter the female toilet located adjacent to the said main point and opened the flasium and intruded into the flasium, thereby making the flas and clothes from the flasium in which the flasium was reported, and that the injured party “at any time” was demanded by the injured party even if he was demanded that the damaged party “at the time.”

"............ for about three minutes, women's toilets were located."

Accordingly, the defendant invadeds on the room possessed by the injured person.

2. In the main point of “D” operated by the victim F (n, 43 years of age) on the same day, the Defendant, as described in paragraph 1, was sprinked with G, a customer, on the ground that the Defendant entered a female toilet and locked the door, etc., on the ground that he/she committed an abnormal behavior, as described in paragraph 1, and then sprinked with G, a customer, who was sprinked. In order to sprinke, the Defendant spicked up the floor by drinking the spicker E of the victim who was sprinked with the victims, and spicked with the victims, who continued to have a conflict with the victims, and broken it into the glass wall of the said main point, and then spicked “n't spicked,”

N. L. L.C. Doz. Doz.

It refers to "", and the victims have brokened a beer's disease.

Accordingly, the defendant inflicted an injury on the victim E for the number of days of treatment, and inflicted an assault on the victims by carrying dangerous articles.

Summary of Evidence

[Judgment No. 1]

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E (fact No. 2 of the ruling);

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against F, E, or G;

1. A criminal investigation report (on-site conditions and accompanying photographs at the time of dispatch), a criminal investigation report (to hear statements by police officers from call to police officers - relating to a shouldered beer's disease);

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Relevant provisions of the Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

arrow