logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2016.07.22 2016고단1200
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] The defendant was sentenced to a summary order of one million won or more for a crime of violating road traffic law at the Seoul Eastern District Court on September 22, 2006, and a summary order of 1.5 million won or more for the same crime at the Jung-gu District Court on June 14, 2007, and the court was sentenced to imprisonment for six months, suspension of execution two years, and order to attend the course for the same crime on May 14, 2008, and was sentenced to imprisonment for the same crime at the same court on November 1, 201, and was sentenced to imprisonment for six months, suspension of execution of one year, and order to attend the course on October 17, 2014, and the same court was sentenced to imprisonment for eight months, suspension of execution of two years, community service order, protection, observation, etc. and confirmed on October 25, 2014 at the present probation period.

"2016 Highest 1200"

1. On March 13, 201, the Defendant: (a) violated the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) and the Road Traffic Act (drawing without a license) driving a C car with C car under the influence of alcohol of about 0.136% of alcohol concentration in blood without obtaining a driver’s license from around 00:01, on the roads near the Manung-dong New-dong Market at Sungnam-si to the roads front of the same 4510-3 water contamination.

"2016 Highest 1236"

2. On May 15, 2016, the Defendant was driving a CKa car without obtaining a driver’s license from around 2 km section from May 11, 201 to around 311 in the village of the "New World" in the central Dong-dong, Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si to the road.

3. The Defendant in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation Act is the owner of the above C car, and the owner of the automobile shall not operate the automobile on the road which is not mandatory insurance.

Nevertheless, the defendant operated this car without mandatory insurance at the time and place specified in paragraph 2.

Summary of Evidence

"2016 Highest 1200"

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Inquiries into the results of crackdown on driving alcohol and the statement of the circumstances of the driver in charge; and

arrow