Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, together with C, offered with D and E that he will be responsible for and repaid the money in the future, provided that he will be liable for and repaid the money in the future, and conspired with D and E to acquire the prepaid money from the Multilaters, without any need to work in the Multilaters, following the Defendant:

1. On September 30, 2005, at Fda near a bus terminal located in the south-gu counterpart of the city at port at port on September 17:30, 2005, the above D falsely means that “the victim H, who is a GDac Group, shall be changed to three million won in advance payment from GDac Group to an employee,” and the above E, by means of guaranteeing D’s prepaid payment, deceiving the victim by means of guaranteeing D’s prepaid payment, and as soon as D immediately receives three million won in advance payment, from the victim;

2. On November 14:00 of the same year, at the Ulsan-gu I office, Ulsan-gu I office, and D and E, to the victim K, who is a JDa-gu business owner, “A request from her mother-do to pay the prepaid payment to his employee”, the above D, under the pretext of the prepaid payment, was immediately received from the victim, and KRW 500,000,000,000 from the Daegu Bank account in the name of his father around the 3th of the same month; and one million won from the Daegu Bank account in the name of his father on the 3th of the same month;

4. Around that time, 2.5 million won was remitted to the same account in the light of the police, and 50,000 won was delivered as advance payment, and E received 6 million won in total from the Daegu bank account in M to the Daegu bank account in M.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. C’s legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused;

1. Statement made by each prosecutor's office with respect to D and C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning D or C of a protocol of examination of suspect to the prosecution;

1. Article 347 (1) and Article 30 of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;