The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is that the Defendant would not give the amount of money he/she wants until the date when the judgment on the division of the property is rendered, while talking about the division of the property by posting a telephone from his/her own mobile phone (D) on March 16, 2018 to his/her mobile phone (C) using his/her own mobile phone (D) at around 17:02 on March 16, 2018.

In other words, "Is the death of the deceased in the inside of the Republic of Korea."

person who has died or died on the part of the person.

Article 14(1) of the former Food and Drug Protection Act.

Whether such bankruptcy should be declared.

"The body of the victim is threatened with any danger and injury to the body of the victim" by referring to "the death of the party, the inside of the house, the inside of the house can be seen as "the value of the party," but the value of the house can be seen as "the value of the party."

2. According to Article 283(1) and (3) of the former Criminal Act, a crime of intimidation may not be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent.

According to the record, on April 17, 2018, the victim, after instituting the instant prosecution, clearly expresses his/her intention not to have the Defendant punished by submitting a written withdrawal of complaint stating that “the defendant only agreed upon and withdraw the complaint,” to this court.

3. According to the conclusion, the prosecution of this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and it is so decided as per Disposition.