1. The defendant shall receive KRW 20,000,000 from the plaintiff, and at the same time, shall be the building stated in the attached Table to the plaintiff.

The fact that the Plaintiff is a housing reconstruction project partnership with the Seoul Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Seoul Mapo-gu Project District, the head of Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government authorizing the management and disposal plan on June 3, 2016 for the housing reconstruction project implemented by the Plaintiff on June 9, 2016, and announced it on June 9, 2016, and the Defendant leased and occupied the buildings listed in the attached Table in the said project district from D to KRW 20,000,000, monthly rent of KRW 1,300,000, the fact that the said building located in the said project district is not disputed between the parties, or is recognized by comprehensively taking account of the entries in the attached

Comprehensively taking account of the above facts, pursuant to Articles 48-2(1), 49(6), and 44(1) and (2) of the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents, the Defendant is obligated to deliver the building listed in the attached list to the Plaintiff at the same time as the Plaintiff receives deposit money of KRW 20 million from the Plaintiff.

Although the defendant asserts that the premium shall be paid KRW 25,00,000,000, the tenant does not have any basis for claiming the return of the premium to the project implementer, unlike the deposit, and the statement in Section B 2-1 through 42 cannot be deemed to have a claim for the return of the premium to the lessor. Therefore, the above argument is without merit.