Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On July 24, 2016, the Defendant: (a) on July 24, 2016, the head of Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Seoul, went to the destination while getting out of the water station located in 924 in Suwon-gu, Suwon-si; and (b) on July 24, 2016, B operated the said taxi and went to the Si Police Station E-gu, Suwon-gu, Suwon-si.

At around 10:05 on the same day, the Defendant heard that he would return home from F to a police officer who belongs to the said E zone, and repeatedly sees that he would be able to pay a taxi fee from F, and that he would be able to do so, such as “the police officer would be flick, Chewing,” and that he was flicking the horse in his possession on the floor of the said zone, and assault F’s buckbucks that he would be able to restrain.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the investigation and maintenance of order of F crime, which is a police officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each statement made by the police officer in F and B;

1. Application of each of the visual Acts and subordinate statutes to images of damaged parts;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act is that the defendant has no record of criminal punishment, confession and reflects against the defendant while committing a crime, resulting in the defendant's contingent crime, considering the circumstances favorable to the defendant that the degree of the exercise of violence against a police officer is not severe, and the punishment is to be determined as ordered in light of all the circumstances shown in the arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, motive for committing a crime, and circumstances after committing a crime.