logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2018.06.05 2018고단1024
절도
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, without certain occupation, discovered that the victim C was loaded with the pipe, etc. owned by the victim while locating stolen goods while visiting the surrounding areas of the person who had been living in the Daegu Two-Class Park without any occupation, was loaded with the victim C's cargo loaded with the victim's seat, and sold the pipe, etc. after the theft to raise the cost of living.

On November 2017, 2017, the Defendant: (a) in the Daegu-gu D Building parking lot; (b) in a way that the Defendant was able to enter the victim C’s Poter-owned Poter-owned Poter-owned Poter-owned Poter to load the said cargo onto the said Poter-owned Poter-owned Poter-owned Pos; (c) cut off the market value equivalent to KRW 34,00,000 at KRW 70,000 at the market value; and (d) taken off the pipe 10,000.

As seen above, the Defendant stolen a pipe equivalent to KRW 3,215,00 in the market price of the victim C and E owned by the victim, as indicated in the crime inundation table, from around November 2017 to April 8, 2018, including the theft of a pipe owned by the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement protocol against C and E;

1. Shot photographs at the seat of the earth, photographs at the seat of the crime scene, photographs showing the suspect's impression, photographs at the scene of seizure, photographs of seized objects, photographs from the front of CCTV on the water, photographs of electric wires, photographs of damaged vehicles, and photographs of the CCTV at the seat of each crime scene;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on seizure records;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The circumstances favorable to the reasons for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Concurrent Crimes: The defendant committed each of the crimes of this case again even though he/she could have the record of being punished for the crime of this case at a time of the crime of this case, the damage resulting from the crime of this case has not been recovered, and the same shall apply in the short term.

arrow