beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On September 8, 2017, the Defendant appeared as a witness of the compulsory indecent act case against the above court No. 2017 order 1029, which was located in Gwangju District Court's Netcheon-si, Namcheon-si, Seoul, as a witness of the said court's instant indecent act case.
The Defendant, despite the fact that he received the gift of the Uniform from B and received the uniform around May 28, 2016, on the question of “Is the witness’s receipt of the gift of the mountain uniform on May 28, 2016” from his defense counsel, “Is the Republic of Korea on August 20, 2016.”
testimony and continued “Is the clothes received from the futures and have any other indication that they are not returned to.”
“In response to the question “I are packed as they are without the reason to receive”.
testimony, “A person who has sustained only once”
As to the question "", the testimony was made as "for example".
Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.
Summary of Evidence
1. Partial statement of the defendant;
1. Statement made by the police with regard to B;
1. Recording book (2017 Height 1029) / The defendant and his defense counsel have testified as above at the time of receiving the mountain uniform, and they did not have any criminal intent of perjury;
The argument is asserted.
However, the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, namely, (i) B purchased a mountain uniform on February 13, 2016; (ii) the Defendant appears to have donated it to the Defendant; (iii) the Defendant voluntarily stated that the time of receipt of the mountain uniform was “Istoday on August 20, 2016;” and (iv) the Defendant was considerably different from the time of purchase of the mountain uniform; and (iii) the Defendant was not at the time of testimony.
The statement was made that the uniform was not located once.
The above evidence was found (the defendant also recognized) that he was not in the place of a mountain uniform.
In order to claim, there is a need to make a false statement at the time of gift of the uniform.