1. As to the Plaintiff’s KRW 662,80,000 and KRW 5 million among them, Defendant B shall be from January 29, 2016, and KRW 31.4 million among them.

1. The following facts do not conflict between the parties, or may be acknowledged in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings, or are remarkable in this Court, in the entries in Gap evidence Nos. 1, 4 through 8, 18, 19, 20, 32, 33 (if any, including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 12, 18 through 21, and 25.

1) The Plaintiff is a service to inquire of the customer’s credit conditions and approve the payment for the credit card value-added telecommunications network (VN: hereinafter “VN service”) through the credit card table, POS, HOST, etc. connected with the credit card merchant when the customer pays the payment by credit card from the credit card merchant.

(2) Defendant B is the representative of “F” for a VN service agency, and is also in charge of business operations in other VN service agencies, including gas stations, restaurants, and stations that are provided with credit card settlement equipment and services related thereto.

Defendant C is the friendship and employee of Defendant B, and Defendant D is the representative in the name of G and the mother of Defendant E.

B. G’s establishment and business 1) Defendant E, while engaging in oil supply business against a gas station in Busan and South Korea, had a business registered under the name of “G” in the name of Defendant D, which is the mother of Defendant D, on March 24, 2014. Defendant B entered into an agency contract with the Plaintiff on August 1, 2013 with the content that I was delegated the Plaintiff’s recruitment, management, etc. of VN service franchise stores between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff.

After that, G accepted the status of the said agency contract of G on May 1, 2014, and the Plaintiff and G concluded a new agency contract on the same day.

3. Meanwhile, on the other hand.