1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant, including those resulting from the supplementary participation.

Facts of recognition

A. With respect to the Plaintiff’s vehicle B (hereinafter “Plaintiff’s vehicle”), the Defendant is an insurer who has concluded each automobile insurance contract with respect to the Defendant’s vehicle C (hereinafter “Defendant’s vehicle”).

The plaintiff assistant intervenor is the driver of the plaintiff vehicle.

나. 원고 차량은 2016. 10. 12. 20:25경 부산 해운대구 좌동 선경아파트 앞 편도 2차로 도로(이하 ‘이 사건 도로’라 한다)를 신곡중학교 사거리 방면에서 청사포입구 사거리 방면으로 1차로를 따라 직진하던 중, 이 사건 도로 우측으로 SK뷰 아파트로 진입하는 도로(이하 ‘이 사건 진입로’라 한다)가 이 사건 도로와 ‘ㅏ’자 형으로 교차하는 지점에서, 이 사건 진입로를 빠져나와 이 사건 도로의 중앙선 너머 차로(원고 차량 진행 반대쪽)로 이 사건 도로를 횡단하여 좌회전을 하려던 피고 차량과 충돌하였다

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). C.

On December 29, 2016, the Plaintiff paid KRW 13,430,000 for the repair cost of Plaintiff’s vehicle as insurance money.

【In the absence of dispute, the Plaintiff asserts that the instant accident occurred due to the illegal left-hand turn at the entrance of the apartment, although the Defendant’s vehicle ought to turn to the right-hand turn at the entrance of the apartment after going to the road of this case when coming to the road of this case from the access road of this case, and the Plaintiff’s vehicle going to the first lane according to the straight-hand signal at the time could not be seen as Defendant’s vehicle because it continued to go to the second lane, and therefore, the instant accident occurred due to the gross negligence of Defendant’s vehicle.

In this regard, the defendant did not make an illegal left turn, and the plaintiff's vehicle also took part in the area of the accident of this case, which is a child protection zone, due to negligence that caused the accident of this case.