logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.05.27 2019나39699
구상금
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant exceeding the following order for payment shall be revoked, and that part shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is an insurer who has entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to D vehicles (hereinafter “Plaintiff vehicle”). The Defendant is an insurer who has entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to E vehicles (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”).

B. (1) On May 18, 2018, the Plaintiff’s vehicle: (a) around 11:45 on May 18, 2018, is the front distance of the F.L. (hereinafter “instant intersection”).

) On the back side of the instant vehicle, the vehicle was stopped to turn to the left and the Defendant vehicle attempted to turn to the left on the back side of the instant intersection in accordance with the left-hand turn turn at the instant intersection. 2) While the Defendant vehicle was passing to the right-hand side of the Plaintiff vehicle by making a left-hand turn to the right-hand side of the instant intersection, the Defendant vehicle shocked the left-hand turn of the Plaintiff vehicle while the vehicle passes to the right-hand side of the Plaintiff vehicle.

(2) On June 15, 2018, the Plaintiff paid KRW 280,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,0000,000,000,000

2. The parties' assertion

A. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion was that the instant accident occurred due to the shock of the Plaintiff’s vehicle at which the Defendant, who made a left-hand turn, was parked and caused by the total negligence of the Defendant vehicle.

Therefore, the defendant, who is the insurer of the defendant vehicle, is obligated to pay 280,000 won and damages for delay to the plaintiff who subrogated and exercises the insurer's damage claim against the plaintiff.

B. The gist of the defendant's assertion is that the defendant's vehicle did not shock the plaintiff's vehicle, and even if the defendant's vehicle shocks the plaintiff's vehicle, the defendant's vehicle would normally turn to the left.

arrow