Defendant

All appeals by prosecutors are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The sentence imposed by the court below (two years and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. The sentence imposed by the Prosecutor is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. The circumstances are favorable to the Defendant, such as the fact that the Defendant was found to have committed the instant crime, and that all of the instant crimes are against the Defendant, and that some of the crimes were committed without much weight in the amount of damage caused by the instant crime, and that the Defendant has no record of being punished for the same kind of crime.

However, the crime of this case is an offense falling under the so-called “fame fire prevention,” where the Defendant, without any particular reason, destroyed a motor vehicle parked in a non-discriminatory manner or attempted to prevent a fire. In light of the motive and circumstances of the crime, there were concerns over causing additional danger if the crime is bad in light of the motive and circumstances of the crime, and the Defendant did not take measures to recover damage even at the time of the trial, and taking into account the circumstances unfavorable to the Defendant, such as the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, means and method of the crime, the method and method of the crime, and the sentencing guidelines for the establishment of the Sentencing Committee of the Supreme Court, etc., it does not seem that the court below exceeded the discretionary discretion by taking into account the following factors: (a) the punishment imposed by the court is too heavy or unfa

3. In conclusion, since the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.