logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2013.11.29 2013고정1246
부정수표단속법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,500,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 22, 2003, the Defendant entered into a check contract with the Industrial Bank of Korea branch offices and made a transaction of household checks under the name of the Defendant.

On December 2, 2012, the Defendant issued a check number “G”, face value “5,00,000,000”, and a copy of the above bank bank check in the name of the Defendant as of April 2, 2013.

On April 2, 2013, the holder of the check presented the check payment order to the above bank on April 2, 2013.

However, the Defendant did not pay for free trade.

Until the end of the same month, the Defendant issued KRW 15,00,000 in three face value of the household check in the same manner, such as the No. 1 through No. 3 of the attached Table 1, at the same place of crime, at the same time, and the holder of the check presented a payment proposal within the period of payment, but did not pay for each transaction.

2. On January 22, 2003, the Defendant entered into a check contract with the Bank of Korea's main business branch on January 22, 2003 and traded household checks under the name of the Defendant.

At the end of December 2012, the Defendant issued one copy of the check number “H”, “5,00,000 won”, and “date of issuance” under the name of the Defendant at the F Office in Namyang-si, Namyang-si, the end of December 2012.

On May 10, 2013, the holder of the check presented the check payment order to the bank.

However, the Defendant did not pay for free trade.

Until the end of the same month including this, the Defendant issued 20,000,000 won in total at four times in the same manner as shown in the attached list 2 of the crimes committed in the same place, and the bearer of the check presented payment within the time limit for presentment for payment, but did not receive it due to transactions without payment.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement; 1.1.

arrow