logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.11.28 2014고단7222
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 29, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul Central District Court, and the execution of the sentence was terminated on June 21, 2013.

The Defendant, who is a person of e-mail, was a person of e-mail and another person’s e-mail hacking to obtain money by means of deceiving the account information recorded in the e-mail to his own account information. On April 2014, 201, the Defendant, who was aware of it, received business funds from Naria to 300,000 won, and provided information, such as a company bank account (Account Number: D), Switzerland code, etc., from the above C, and delivered it to the above person under his name, and the person who received the changed e-mail by hackinging the e-mail to the above deposit account provided by the Defendant. The Defendant conspired to withdraw the amount of money to be entered and divide it into one another.

1. No person who violates the Act on Promotion, etc. of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection shall intrude into an information and communications network without legitimate authority;

On April 29, 2014, the Defendant, in collusion with the above person in bad name, intruded without permission on the victim E-mail account (F) of the e-mail of the victim working at the Hong Kong branch office of JW, using an inficial method at a place where the location is unknown, and then deleted the account number (Account Number (Account Number (K) of the JJ bank in the e-mail (I) sent by the e-mail (H) to G on April 14:33, 2014, and sent the e-mail of which only the account information was changed to the above e-mail account managed by the Defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant conspireds with the above-mentioned person and intrudes on the victim's information and communication network without legitimate authority.

2. The defendant is guilty in collusion with the above-mentioned person.

arrow