The accused shall publicly announce the summary of the judgment of innocence against the accused.

The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is as follows: (a) by hacking the e-mail (F) of the victim G (G; hereinafter “victim”) located in the U.S. in the U.S., the transaction partner, and the transaction details with E in the U.S., the Defendant conspired to deceiving the victim to acquire the transaction proceeds by deceiving the victim as if the remittance account was changed.

Accordingly, on September 8, 2015, the Defendant provided information on the account (Account Number I) of H bank account (Account Number I) of H, Inc. used to receive the above transaction amount to “D,” and acquired information on the e-mail address, etc. of the victim by hackinging the E-mail account (F) at the remote site on September 8, 2015, and around the 12th of the same month, the Defendant transferred the e-mail to the e-mail address (K) used by J, the representative director of the victim, “The existing commodity price transaction account has changed to the e-mail address (K) of H, Inc., the e-mail address (Account Number I) of H, thereby transferring the price of the goods to the above bank account, and received USD 69,008 ($ 74,784,254,256, May 15, 2015 from the victim on the 13th of the same month.

Accordingly, the Defendant, in collusion with D, obtained a total of USD 131,623 ($ 147,287,811) from the injured party twice in total.

Judgment

The defendant asserts that there is no fact that there was no hacking crime in collusion with a foreign fraud organization, and there is no fact that the other party requested to deposit money into the L-related account.

In this regard, there is a similar effect that the account that the overseas fraud organization has deposited the money obtained by hacking is the account of the company operated by L which is a creditor of the defendant, and that the defendant has the same effect as the repayment of the defendant's obligation to L due to the above deposited act.