logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2015.09.10 2015고정73
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a car in a SP area.

On June 5, 2014, the Defendant driven the above car on June 03:25, 2014, and led to the driving distance in front of the Dong-ri, Young-gun, Young-gun, Young-gu, Young-gu, Youngnam to the air of the Young-gu Office in the cadastral construction site.

Since there is an intersection where no signal apparatus is installed, there was a duty of care to confirm whether there is another motor vehicle to enter the intersection by reducing speed and checking the right and the right and the right of the motor vehicle's driver.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and followed the part of the victim D's mast car in front of the left side of the Ethmp car and the pentum part of the Ethmp car, which proceeded with the above private distance from the taxi room to the front side of the above Spath car.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by occupational negligence, got the victim to suffer injuries, such as cerebrovasin, salvine, tension, etc., in need of medical treatment for about two weeks, and escaped without taking necessary measures, such as aiding the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's partial statement made to the effect that a traffic accident, as described in the holding date and at the place;

1. Each legal statement of witness F and D;

1. Written statements of D;

1. The actual condition survey report and evidence and photographs of the scene of a traffic accident;

1. Notification of a detailed statement of handling 112 reported cases, etc.;

1. To make a report of investigation (record of the contents of 112 reported);

1. According to the above evidence of the damage diagnosis report (D), the victim D driver math car was considerably damaged at the time of the instant traffic accident, and the victim was aware of the victim's injury, such as the victim's seated in India, dolusently, the traffic accident site of this case without directly asking or verifying whether the victim was injured or whether the victim was injured.

arrow